Thursday, November 12, 2009
Salmon Returns
Pseudointellectual's cousin, QuiveringSalmon, has returned to offer some sage advice. Or is it advice? Sounds like it could be a threat: don't eat that next salmon: it could be your last.
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Don't listen to the pretentious fish
I just got this in my Yahoo IM web client:

My neck head??? That would only make sense to a fish, who arguably do indeed have neck heads.
I don't have the heart to tell this fish that I love him. Raw. With rice and seaweed. And grilled, of course. Pseudointellectualsalmon may not be in my Contacts; but his brother lies quartered in my freezer, the memory of his flavor indelibly into my neck head.
My neck head??? That would only make sense to a fish, who arguably do indeed have neck heads.
I don't have the heart to tell this fish that I love him. Raw. With rice and seaweed. And grilled, of course. Pseudointellectualsalmon may not be in my Contacts; but his brother lies quartered in my freezer, the memory of his flavor indelibly into my neck head.
Friday, June 05, 2009
Craigslist
Friday, May 22, 2009
New blog up and running
I've decided to make this blog less about all things and instead focus on family and other fun stuff. Like drinking fortified wine (see last blog post). I do have a new blog that is political in nature, where I can rant to no one but myself and have to burden you fine people with my crazy ideas of Obama intentionally destroying America. OK, OK, I promise though, that will be the last time I say anything about it.
Please be sure to put a web filter block on this URL so that you never accidentally stumble upon it: http://sullysoapbox.blogspot.com.
Well - I have to go back to work so that I can continue to earn devalued wages (John, you promised!!). Yeah, yeah. Next time.
Please be sure to put a web filter block on this URL so that you never accidentally stumble upon it: http://sullysoapbox.blogspot.com.
Well - I have to go back to work so that I can continue to earn devalued wages (John, you promised!!). Yeah, yeah. Next time.
Saturday, May 09, 2009
Ewww... creepy!!
Tina and I like to read this blog called Eyes for Lies. She is a human lie detector by nature and by occupation. Anyhow, I just read one of her more recent posts and I found it really disturbing.
What do you suppose this guy was going to do? What was he really after?
What do you suppose this guy was going to do? What was he really after?
Thursday, May 07, 2009
How about this instead:
A $17,000,000,000.00 budget and a $3,400,000,000,000.00 budget cut? Let's flip-flop the numbers. I know, that's not at all realistic. But I think we could get away with a $300 - $400 billion dollar annual budget.
My comments, btw, relate to this article.
My comments, btw, relate to this article.
Let's see if Huff Po publishes
I have no reason to think they won't, but just in case I'm going to paste it on my blog. This was my comment made to this article on Huffington Post:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/republican-political-hack_b_198326.html
COMMENT:
Democrats wouldn't vote for the bill because the pedophile distinction was made? Is it not obvious that pedophiles, as a group, swing both ways? Therefore, isn't it clear that a pedophile would stand to gain added civil protection under the guise of persecution based on sexual preference? I understand the "consensual" qualifier is there for the purpose of handling just such a scenario, but I see the point of explicitly defining pedophilia as not being a qualified orientation. Why let the distinction rest on the collective presumption of what "consensual" means when you can declare the exception explicitly. After all, the possession or distribution of child pornography, I would have to think, qualifies one as something of a pedophile while never requiring the consent of anyone to obtain the images.
And on a separate note, even if this were some sort of dirty political trick, it is hardly unique to one party.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/republican-political-hack_b_198326.html
COMMENT:
Democrats wouldn't vote for the bill because the pedophile distinction was made? Is it not obvious that pedophiles, as a group, swing both ways? Therefore, isn't it clear that a pedophile would stand to gain added civil protection under the guise of persecution based on sexual preference? I understand the "consensual" qualifier is there for the purpose of handling just such a scenario, but I see the point of explicitly defining pedophilia as not being a qualified orientation. Why let the distinction rest on the collective presumption of what "consensual" means when you can declare the exception explicitly. After all, the possession or distribution of child pornography, I would have to think, qualifies one as something of a pedophile while never requiring the consent of anyone to obtain the images.
And on a separate note, even if this were some sort of dirty political trick, it is hardly unique to one party.
Monday, April 20, 2009
Weird dream last night
I don't know how to interpret it. It was night time, about 3am and the sun was still shining. My sister Kim told me that it was not a big deal, sometimes the sun just sets really late here in FLA. Still, I found it bizarre, and I so I brought Tina's Flip camcorder outside to record the craziness because most people were asleep and wouldn't believe me. I think it was supposedly a local and not a global phenomena, one that just crops up every now and again. It was just an odd feeling to be outside, looking around at all of the starkly contrasted shadows on the ground, having been cast by the leaves and branches of the trees. And all of this during a time when the sun should have been long set. Maybe you just had to be there.
Saturday, March 21, 2009
The Manchurian Candidate has been elected
I've been thinking this for a while now, but this article puts it all together. I know the few people who read my blog would disagree. Actually, that's an understatement - they probably think I've gone from middle of the road conservative to certifiable conspiracy whack job. But I have to get this off my chest: Barak Obama, in my opinion, was hand selected to bring about chaos and destruction to the United States. And while I write these words, I'm wrestling with the idea of whether or not I should even bother arguing my point.
I don't think I will go into it fully. Instead, if you're curious as to what has led me off my rocker, I ask that you look into Obama's long time associations yourself. Look into his achievements, voting records, etc. The right-wing World Net Daily had an opinion piece posted days before the election last year that does a fine job of explaining my general point of view.
But you don't need my help understanding my point of view on this; not really. Obama's actions speak louder than any words uttered from this internet soap box.
I don't think I will go into it fully. Instead, if you're curious as to what has led me off my rocker, I ask that you look into Obama's long time associations yourself. Look into his achievements, voting records, etc. The right-wing World Net Daily had an opinion piece posted days before the election last year that does a fine job of explaining my general point of view.
But you don't need my help understanding my point of view on this; not really. Obama's actions speak louder than any words uttered from this internet soap box.
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
idiocy
Friday, March 13, 2009
Baez throwing in the towel for a win
I'm becoming more and more convinced that the defense strategy for Casey Anthony is to throw the case and create a mis-trial. Why they would want this, I imagine has to do with money. Unfortunately, this is more of a gut feeling than anything I can back up with facts. I'm not sure what Baez gains in providing a completely incompetent defense. Maybe I'm just giving him too much credit: perhaps he really has no idea what the hell he's doing.
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Who done it
Tina turned me on to this blog called "Eyes for Lies". It's written by a "human lie detector" - someone who has been identified by the FBI as having an uncanny ability to detect when someone is lying. She doesn't claim to always be right, but her record is pretty close to that.
Go ahead and read her thoughts on cases that have already been solved and you'll see just how accurate she can be.
Unfortunately, this doesn't bode well for Haleigh Cummings. After reading her thoughts on the case and knowing her success record, it's pretty clear what the outcome will be.
Go ahead and read her thoughts on cases that have already been solved and you'll see just how accurate she can be.
Unfortunately, this doesn't bode well for Haleigh Cummings. After reading her thoughts on the case and knowing her success record, it's pretty clear what the outcome will be.
Saturday, March 07, 2009
3/7/2009
We went to Epcot today. We were able to get in, complements a good friend of the family. I won't say who that good friend was because Disney has spies everywhere. They're like the cardnalists of 17th century France. Yeah, I know that's exactly what you were thinking. No really, I mean it, because now that everyone is on facebook, I am truly writing to myself. Well, actually I'll bet Tina pops in every now and again. That's because she's a good wife. And a great mom - she planned out the whole Disney weekend get-away and was responsible for the bulk of its successful execution. Of course, I could say that about any day of the week.
Anyhow, we had a great time at the magic kingdom yesterday. We're debating whether to continue doing the annual three-day / two-night thing or buying season passes. I always think the season passes are going to be less than they really are until I am reminded when I look at the prices. It would cost us about $1K for the family. And that's with black out dates! Still, there is a LOT to do between just MK and Epcot. We haven't even seen the other two.
I'll try to get some videos of the kids at MK and the character breakfast posted tomorrow. Not that anyone other than Tina and I will see them, but I'm going to put them up anyway.
Anyhow, we had a great time at the magic kingdom yesterday. We're debating whether to continue doing the annual three-day / two-night thing or buying season passes. I always think the season passes are going to be less than they really are until I am reminded when I look at the prices. It would cost us about $1K for the family. And that's with black out dates! Still, there is a LOT to do between just MK and Epcot. We haven't even seen the other two.
I'll try to get some videos of the kids at MK and the character breakfast posted tomorrow. Not that anyone other than Tina and I will see them, but I'm going to put them up anyway.
Thursday, February 26, 2009
Facebook - aka - BlogKiller
Now that everyone's resigned themselves to Facebook, our blogs are kind of withering. I suspect this phenomenon will be short-lived. Facebook is good to reconnect to old friends and relatives; but if you've got a soapbox to stand on and opine, nothing beats a blog.
Well, I have nothing more to say. I'm going to facebook now.
Well, I have nothing more to say. I'm going to facebook now.
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
A favorite song
I only heard this song for the first time about two years ago. I just love it, even if it sounds rather whiny. I'm whiny. I'm whining about that fact right now. Whaaa..
Anyhow, here's a link to that favorite song of mine. I don't think anyone else will like it, but hey - you never know.
Anyhow, here's a link to that favorite song of mine. I don't think anyone else will like it, but hey - you never know.
Monday, January 26, 2009
This looks like fun
This band is covering the entirety of Dark Side of the Moon, as well as playing their usual Grateful Dead covers. To me, this sounds like a little slice of heaven. Even though they are "just" a cover band, their sound is pretty good. And I find it impressive that they can recreate Dark Side with such fidelity in a live setting. Maybe it's really not that impressive, but as a musical ignoramus I find it neat-o.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
